skip to content »

Hrvatska prijatelj dating site

Moreover, whether one likes it or not, NATO is the armed wing of American hegemony to which all European countries are expected to submit, including the new Croatia.It must be emphasized that pro-American and pro-NATO sentiments among Croats, along with similar sentiments among other predominantly Catholic nations, such as the Baltic countries, Poland, and Slovakia, are traditionally more pronounced than among Christian Orthodox peoples in Europe.

hrvatska prijatelj dating site-63hrvatska prijatelj dating site-86

If the recent Croatian war of secession is named the “War of Defense,” one is entitled to raise the question whether Croatia between 19 was in the process of protecting and safeguarding the heritage of Communism and Yugoslavia, or whether it was expressing a desire to get rid of it.The accession of Croatia to NATO in 2009 and then to the European Union in 2013 further complicates Croatian identity.Despite the fact that NATO has no more reason to be in Europe, given that its opponent, the Warsaw Pact, was dissolved long ago, NATO, in the Croatian popular consciousness, remains a symbol of Croatia’s adherence to the West, as well as the best defense against the alleged Russian and greater-Serbian appetites.The Great Replacement from the Croatian perspective The scourge of non-European migration flows only further complicates the construction of Croatian identity.Undoubtedly, migratory flows pouring into Europe have had by now a huge psychological impact on all Europeans professing identitarian ideas or those claiming adherence to various European nationalisms.Even the most naive Croats realize that the EU is not a money machine.

It cannot be excluded that Croats, similar to other member states, will soon begin asking themselves not how to keep their place in the EU, but how to walk out of it.

In Croatia, the political class deliberately sidetracks the root causes of the breakup of the former Yugoslavia.

By focusing solely on the real or alleged Serbian threat, Croatia’s political parties, including many followers and supporters of the former Communist leader Marshal Tito, thus allocate themselves a convenient niche in order to hide their bloody legacy.

The more accurate phrase, namely “War of Croatia’s Liberation from Communism and against Yugoslavia” has never been used.

There is a considerable difference, however, between these labels.

What strikes one, however, is that the ongoing large ethno-racial replacement — if one were to use more specific words — goes virtually unreported in the Croatian media.